|
|
|
ÀÌ°æÈñ ( Lee Kyung-Hee ) - ÀÌÈ¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ °Ç°°úÇдëÇÐ °£È£°úÇкÎ
½Å¼öÁø ( Shin Su-Jin ) - ¼øõÇâ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ °£È£Çаú
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Purpose: This integrative review study was done to analyze methods used for validation studies in Korean nursing research.
Methods: In this study, the literature on instrument development in nursing research from Research Information Sharing Service (RISS) and major nursing journal databases in Korea were examined. The MeSH search terms included ¡®nursing¡¯, ¡®instrument¡¯, ¡®instrument development¡¯, ¡®validation¡¯ and 189 articles were included in the review.
Results: The most frequently reported validity type was content validity, followed by construct validity, and criterion validity. One third reported a single type of validity, and 15% of the studies demonstrated three kinds of validity at the same time. In about 40% of the studies, both content and construct validity were examined.
Conclusion: The results of the study indicate that it is necessary to provide a wider variety of evidence to establish whether instruments are valid enough to use in nursing research.
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
Validation studies, Validity, Instrument, Nursing,
|
|
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
|
|